Recruiters visiting Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) for campus placements have made their stance clear: candidates who rely on artificial intelligence tools during the hiring process are not welcome. Companies participating in placement drives are increasingly cautious about AI-generated responses in interviews and assessments. Many firms now explicitly warn students against using AI assistance, viewing it as dishonest and counterproductive. Recruiters emphasize that they seek genuine problem-solving skills, original thinking, and authentic communication from candidates. The growing availability of AI chatbots and writing assistants has raised concerns about fairness and transparency in the selection process. IIT placement cells are also taking note, with some institutes advising students to demonstrate their own capabilities rather than depending on technology. This development reflects broader worries in the job market about how AI might undermine traditional evaluation methods and the importance of human skills in professional settings.
Recruiters Reject AI Use in Campus Placements
Recruiters arriving at IIT campuses for placement season have begun issuing clear warnings to students about using AI tools during interviews and assessments. Companies are concerned that candidates might use chatbots or AI writing assistants to answer questions, solve coding problems, or draft responses. This practice is seen as dishonest and defeats the purpose of evaluating a candidate's true abilities. Firms want to assess genuine problem-solving skills, creativity, and communication abilities without technological interference. Some recruiters have introduced stricter monitoring measures, including proctored tests and live problem-solving sessions, to ensure authenticity. IIT placement committees are also advising students to rely on their own preparation and knowledge. The issue highlights growing tensions between technological advancement and traditional hiring practices, as employers seek candidates who can demonstrate real competence rather than AI-assisted performance.
Source: Link